Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Disputed Reactor Design Moves Forward"

"Westinghouse appears to have won an important first round in a battle with critics over the radical design of the containment system for its new AP1000 reactor. A panel of senior safety advisers has told the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that with a few additional procedures and analyses, the design should be approved.

The Southern Company hopes to get a license this fall to build two of the units, which are meant to have a far lower chance of meltdown because of 'advanced passive' features. But one of those features, the containment, has become a focus of critics.

Like existing Westinghouse units, the AP1000 uses a steel and concrete shell to protect the reactor and vital related parts from external hazards and to hold in any radioactive material released. But the new design is very different from the old."

Matthew L. Wald reports for the New York Times January 31, 2011.

Source: Green (NYT), 02/01/2011