Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"EPA Defends ‘Secret Science’ Rule to House Democrats"

"An EPA official defended the agency’s proposed “secret science” rule, but declined to answer questions about the basis for the rule, which has drawn criticism from environmental groups and other agency watchers.

Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, principal deputy assistant administrator for science at the Environmental Protection Agency, told Democrats on the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee that she had to defer questions about statutory authority to other agency officials.

Orme-Zavaleta, a career employee with a doctorate in wildlife science and public health, was asked about a report that the EPA based its authority for the rule on a 1966 statute."

Stephen Lee reports for Bloomberg Environment November 13, 2019.

SEE ALSO:

"EPA: Senior Official Defends Latest 'Secret Science' Proposal" (Greenwire)

"The EPA's Anti-Science ‘Transparency’ Rule Has a Long History" (Wired)

"Scientists Join Democrats In Panning EPA's 'Secret Science' Rule" (The Hill)

Source: Bloomberg Environment, 11/14/2019