Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"A Famous Climate Scientist Won A $1M Verdict. Then His Case Took A Turn."

"A judge vastly reduced climate researcher Michael Mann’s award, sanctioned his lawyers for presenting false evidence and ordered him to pay $530,000."

"For defenders of climate science, the court ruling was a big victory in the fight against misinformation.

Michael Mann, one of the country’s most prominent climate scientists, won more than $1 million last year in a defamation case. A jury found that two conservative commentators had defamed him by alleging that he was like a child molester in the way he had “molested and tortured” climate data.

Now, a year after that ruling, the case has taken a turn that leaves Mann in the position of the one who owes money.

On Wednesday, a judge sanctioned Mann’s legal team for “bad-faith trial misconduct” for overstating how much the scientist lost in potential grant funding as a result of reputational harm."

Dino Grandoni reports for the Washington Post March 14, 2025.

Source: Washington Post, 03/18/2025