Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

Fossil-Funded Research Used To Avoid Paying Workers Hurt By 2010 Gulf Spill

"Academic research paid for by BP and Exxon is being used to combat workers’ claims that exposure to oil and chemical dispersants made them ill."

"A Florida law firm says a University of Louisville professor broke the school’s conflict of interest policies when he worked as a litigation consultant for BP at the same time that he published academic articles and presented on oil spill science.

The law firm sent a letter to the university’s president earlier this year detailing how professor emeritus and microbiologist Ronald Atlas allowed BP and Exxon to review and edit his work, which supported the oil companies’ claims that oil from BP’s 2010 spill in the Gulf and the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska degraded in toxicity and that the ecosystems could bounce back. The Downs Law Group, based in Miami, Florida, obtained emails between the professor and the companies through subpoenas in their lawsuits for personal injury and medical claims on behalf of cleanup workers.

“People should know if you are a scientist or a paid consultant,” said Jason Larey, an attorney at Downs Law Group. “When you’re a litigation consultant, you can’t conflict with your client,”he explained, which means you agree that your work won't conflict with the company's ability to make a profit. Such an agreement is incompatible with being an objective scientist."

Sara Sneath reports for Drilled March 21, 2025.

Source: Drilled, 03/24/2025