Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Judges Tread Carefully Over Possible Conflicts In BP Criminal Case"

"After two federal judges recused themselves from a criminal case against former BP PLC managers indicted for their role in the Deepwater Horizon disaster, a third has made disclosures of his own."



"U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval of the Eastern District of Louisiana has asked the parties whether they think he should be disqualified from overseeing the trial of Robert Kaluza and Donald Vidrine, who were both well site leaders on the Deepwater Horizon rig. Duval doesn't think he needs to step aside, and the defendants' lawyers have already said they agree.

Duval issued an order Wednesday in which he noted two potential grounds for recusal: that he owns a camp near a beach on the coast and is therefore entitled to compensation from BP and that his son is working for the fund set up to compensate victims of the spill.

The judge made it clear he does not think he has to recuse himself because he 'neither has a direct interest in the subject matter of this criminal proceeding nor does he believe that his impartiality with respect to the defendant may reasonably be questioned.'"

Lawrence Hurley reports for Greenwire December 7, 2012.
 

Source: Greenwire, 12/10/2012