Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

Effort To Reform Secret Federal Advisory Committees Soldiers On

March 13, 2013

Secret meetings and conflicts of interest for experts on federal advisory committees are still problems, openness advocates told Congress during Sunshine Week 2013.

Such problems are supposed to be addressed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) of 1972, but gaps in its requirements for openness and integrity have remained — and perennial efforts to amend the law have not fixed the problems. Bills to reform FACA have been considered, but not enacted, in the previous two Congresses.

This week the WatchDog hears talk that such efforts will continue in the current (113th) Congress. Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-MO) has been a frequent sponsor of such bills in the past. He has not yet introduced a FACA bill in the current Congress.

FACA requires the Government Services Administration to maintain a searchable online database on federal advisory committees. It's a great aid for reporters in searching for secret meetings and conflicts of interest on a particular beat.


 

This is one of the stories in the March 13, 2013 issue of SEJ's biweekly WatchDog. Find the rest of the stories and past issues here.

SEJ Publication Types: 
Topics on the Beat: 
Visibility: