SEJournal Online is the digital news magazine of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Learn more about SEJournal Online, including submission, subscription and advertising information.
On a 229-191 party-line vote, the GOP-controlled House passed a bill (HR 1422) reining in EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) — authorizing conflicts of interest for its members and gagging them in communications about subjects they are expert on.
Science integrity and environmental groups had opposed the bill, which the House passed on November 18, 2014. Although it is unlikely to get traction in the Democrat-controlled Senate this year, it might face better chances of enactment when the Senate goes Republican next year. The White House has threatened to veto it.
The bill would create more room on the SAB, which is really a network of subject-related committees and subcommittees, for experts who have financial ties to industries affected by EPA regulations. The bill allows SAB members to have conflicts of interest, as long as those conflicts are disclosed.
The bill forbids SAB members from reporting directly to the EPA. Further, it prohibits SAB members from participating in matters that, even indirectly, involve discussion of their own work. This would keep experts on the board from having input into matters they know about. Alternatively, the bill imposes sweeping new requirements for "public participation," and requires the SAB to address all public comments. This would enable industry lobbyists who are not board members or subject experts to dominate scientific discussions.
- "House Passes Bill That Makes It Harder for Scientists To Advise the EPA," Climate Progress, November 18, 2014, by Emily Atkin.
- "House Republicans Just Passed a Bill Forbidding Scientists from Advising the EPA on Their Own Research," Salon, November 19, 2014, by Lindsay Abrams.
- "White House Threatens To Veto Bills That Would Require More EPA Reporting," Associated Press, November 17, 2014.
- Full text of HR 1422, as passed by House.