Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

State 'Ag-Gag' Laws Spreading, Protect Misdeeds from Scrutiny

May 22, 2013

After a Tennessee governor's veto, proponents of "ag-gag" legislation vowed to try again in that state next year. Bills criminalizing the collection of information about abuses in livestock operations are still being pushed in other states — and the mechanism may be extended to stifle reporting on other environmental abuses.

At least 5 states have enacted some form of "ag-gag" legislation, designed to discourage activists and journalists from documenting cruelty to farm animals raised for food. More than half a dozen other states are considering them. Such bills might typically criminalize omission of an activist's organizational affiliation on a job application — making undercover investigations impossible. Some require immediate reporting of any observed abuse — preventing longer-term investigations of chronic animal abuse.

Now it seems such laws may be used to suppress reporting on "fracking" (oil and gas production using hydraulic fracturing), at least in Pennsylvania, because it often occurs on leased farmlands.

SEJ Publication Types: 
Topics on the Beat: 
Visibility: