SEJournal Online is the digital news magazine of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Learn more about SEJournal Online, including submission, subscription and advertising information.
An important, but little-known, transparency law requires that meetings of federal advisory committees be open to the public. But a new study shows that more than two-thirds of the time, they are in fact closed to the public.
On those committees, industry "experts" who have a financial stake may be telling agencies to ignore scientific findings in their regulation of things like environmental health and toxic chemicals.
The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) is supposed to limit conflict of interest on the part of committee members and also to maximize public scrutiny. But a study by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service found that closed meetings were the rule, rather than the exception (71% were closed in fiscal 2014). The study was based on a database maintained by the General Services Administration. Transparency requirements of FACA are bolstered by another law, the Government in the Sunshine Act.
- "The Federal Advisory Committee Act: Analysis of Operations and Costs," Congressional Research Service (R44248), October 27, 2015, by Wendy Ginsberg.
- "Government Transparency? Most Federal Advisory Committee Meetings Now Held in Secret: Report," International Business Times, November 3, 2015, by David Sirota.
- FACA Database (Federal Advisory Committee Act).
- Previous Stories: WatchDogs of August 13, 2014, and March 13, 2013.