Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

Federal Judge Strikes Down Idaho "Ag-Gag" Law as Unconstitutional

August 12, 2015

A federal judge on August 3, 2015, struck down Idaho's law against undercover videos in agricultural facilities, saying it violated the First Amendment.

"The facts show the state's purpose in enacting the statute was to protect industrial animal agriculture by silencing its critics," district Judge B. Lynn Winmill wrote.

Sometimes investigative journalists need to go undercover. Nellie Bly did it. Upton Sinclair did it. And sometimes muckraking journalists need undercover whistleblowers to tip them to abuses. All that could be illegal under the "ag-gag" laws passed by some farm states in recent years.

Seven states besides Idaho have passed similar laws: Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, North Dakota, Utah and North Carolina. The question now is what effect the Idaho decision will have on their enforceability. A coalition of journalism groups currently has pending a lawsuit challenging Utah's ag-gag law on First Amendment grounds.

SEJ Publication Types: 
Visibility: