Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

Secret Sugar Can Claim "Confidentiality" in Food Recall

August 3, 2016

Consumers learned in late July of a "voluntary" recall of some processed food products due to possible metal fragments in sugar used to make them. The manufacturers weren't required to recall the products or notify consumers — but they did so anyway.

But the source of the contaminated sugar remained secret, because the Food and Drug Administration is not legally required to disclose it. The incident illustrated the lopsided deference that much federal law gives to claims of "trade secrets" — putting protection of companies above protection of the public.

In practice, claims of trade secrecy — whether in consumer protection laws or environmental protection laws — often go unjustified and unchallenged. In the case of the secret sugar, the problem is not only the weakness of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, but the Trade Secrets Act and the trade secrets exemption to the Freedom of Information Act.

SEJ Publication Types: 
Visibility: